By Jeremy Diamond, Kevin Liptak, Paula Newton and Donna Borak
October 1, 2018
Canada agreed late Sunday to sign on to a trade deal between the United States and Mexico, revamping the three-country North American Free Trade Agreement after more than a year of tortuous negotiations.
Just hours before a midnight deadline, the US and Canadian governments agreed to a deal that would allow US farmers greater access to Canada’s dairy market and address concerns about potential US auto tariffs, officials from both countries said.
The agreement with Canada and Mexico—two of the United States’ biggest trading partners— fulfills President Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to renegotiate NAFTA and avoids his threat to exclude Canada if the talks failed.
The new deal has a new name: the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
“It will strengthen the middle class, and create good, well-paying jobs and new opportunities for the nearly half billion people who call North America home,” said US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland in a joint statement.
Trump praised the agreement early Monday as a “great deal” for all three countries that would expand markets for American farmers and manufacturers.
“The USMCA is a historic transaction!” he said on Twitter.
But some experts questioned whether the changes to NAFTA were worth the strain put on relations with Canada by Trump’s threats and brinkmanship during the negotiations.
“We have really hurt relationships with our major ally… for the sake of a few gallons of milk,” Jeffrey Rosensweig, a business professor at Emory University, said on CNN.
Negotiators from the three countries spent all weekend working over the phone, hoping to keep the nearly 25-year-old deal alive.
Earlier in the evening, Trump was briefed on the nearly finalized negotiations by Lighthizer and White House adviser Jared Kushner.
The Trump administration plans to send the new deal to Congress, starting a 60-day review period before Trump can sign it. Congress can suggest changes during that time.
Ahead of the weekend’s talks, several lawmakers had warned that they would not support a deal without Canada.
“It would be a monumental mistake to do this without Canada,” US Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate committee that oversees trade, said Friday, before the text was delivered. “It’s basically surrendering on fixing NAFTA.”
The Trump administration has been working to sign a new trade deal before Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto leaves office on December 1. To meet that deadline, the text of the agreement had to be submitted to Congress before October.
Negotiators from the three countries began talks about updating NAFTA more than a year ago. Trump had campaigned on renegotiating or ripping up the trade pact, calling it “the worst deal maybe ever signed.”
In August, the United States and Mexico resolved an issue over auto manufacturing, but several sticking points with Canada remained. Trump wanted Canada to open its dairy market to US farmers, and Canada wanted to preserve a mechanism for resolving disputes.
Those goals were achieved in the deal reached late Sunday, according to a Canadian official with knowledge of the negotiations.
The access to Canada’s dairy market will closely mirror what was given under recently negotiated agreements between Canada and the European Union and a separate one with Pacific countries, the Canadian official said.
Canada and Mexico are the United States’ two biggest export markets. A deal that left one of them out could cause chaos for businesses that rely on trade between the countries.
The US Chamber of Commerce has said it would be “unacceptable to sideline Canada, our largest export market in the world.”
Vehicles, machinery and agricultural products make up much of the goods traded between the countries.
“We have a level playing field with Canada and Mexico, and we have for the last quarter century that NAFTA has been in place,” said Rosensweig of Emory University. “This changes nothing. It’s just a political move.”
Katie Lobosco and Sherisse Pham contributed to this report.
Questions Using Close Reading and Critical Thinking:
- The first section of an article should answer the questions “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, and “Where?” Identify the four Ws of this article. (Note: The rest of the news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
- Does this article have any bias? Why or why not?
- Mexico, the U.S., and Canada each benefit from the newly named United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). What product(s) does each country produce that the other two desire?
- Why does U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland say, “It will strengthen the middle class, and create good, well-paying jobs and new opportunities for the nearly half billion people who call North America home.” How has the former NAFTA deal strengthened the middle class, and how will it continue to do so in the new USMCA deal? By reviewing this article or looking at other credible news sources online, give three different reasons.
- Justin Trudeau, Canada’s Prime Minister, signed the trade deal hours before the deadline. Why did it take Canada a year to come to an agreement?
- Canada is vital to the success of this treaty. How would their lack of participation affect their relations with the U.S.? Scan the article and give three reasons why.
- Some experts claim they aren’t sure if the ongoing negotiations with Canada, one of the biggest allies of the U.S., was worth the tension it created between the two countries. Do you feel as if it damaged U.S. relations with Canada? Why or why not? In six to eight sentences, support your claim with evidence from the article.
Click here to view more: www.cnn.com/2018/09/30/politics/trump-nafta-canada/index.html
How useful was this post?
Click on a star to rate it!
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Tell us how we can improve this post? If you would like a response, please include an email address.
Thanks for your feedback!