Two Largest Teachers Unions Call for Schools to Revise or End Active Shooter Drills

“Traumatizing students as we work to keep students safe from gun violence is not the answer.”

February 13, 2020
Associated Press and Elizabeth Chuck
NBC News

The nation’s two largest teachers’ unions want schools to revise or eliminate active shooter drills, asserting Tuesday that they can harm students’ mental health and that there are better ways to prepare for the possibility of a school shooting.

The American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association joined with the advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund in calling for an end to unannounced drills or drills that simulate gun violence.

“Everywhere I travel, I hear from parents and educators about active shooter drills terrifying students, leaving them unable to concentrate in the classroom and unable to sleep at night,” said Lily Eskelsen Garcia, president of the National Education Association. “So traumatizing students as we work to keep students safe from gun violence is not the answer. That is why if schools are going to do drills, they need to take steps to ensure the drills do more good than harm.”

Active shooter drills have become more common as more school massacres have made headlines. But there is hardly any research on the drills’ effectiveness, and while there are some federal recommendations, there is no standard template for schools to follow in terms of how to do them, how often to conduct them and how to explain them to students of different ages.

The report released Tuesday recommends schools concentrate on training teachers to respond to an active shooter incident rather than drilling students.

It also issued guidelines for schools that decide to use drills. Those include never simulating an actual shooting; giving parents, educators and students advance notice of any drill; working with mental health officials to create age-appropriate and trauma-informed drills; and tracking the effects of drills.

About 95 percent of schools drilled students on lockdown procedures in the 2015–16 school year, according to a survey by the National Center for Education Statistics.

“In Indiana they were shooting teachers with rubber pellets so they would feel the adrenaline of what a school shooting would feel like,” said Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, which is part of Everytown. “In California recently, a superintendent hired a stranger to wear a mask to rattle the doors of classrooms without letting faculty and students know. We’ve seen students asked to pretend to be victims and lie down using fake blood in the hallway.”

Jean-Paul Guilbault, the chief executive of the ALICE Training Institute, which runs active shooter drills, said they are effective when done appropriately. He said his company never runs surprise drills but believes that simulating an event is the best way to prepare for one “and allow students to practice their options, whether that be lockdown or evacuation.”

“According to a recent study conducted by the U.S. Secret Service, most school shootings last for two minutes or less, and nearly half of the events studied ended within one minute,” he said in a written statement. “That means it is up to us to keep ourselves safe for those seconds that will feel as slow as a lifetime. We drill so everyone has a plan when faced with danger, to give people a chance at survival.”

A “one-size-fits-all” approach is not the answer though, said another advocate of active shooter drills.

“What might work for one school in an urban area might not work for another in a rural area,” said Raymond Holcomb, president and managing director of 1st Watch Global, an organization that helps businesses address potential threats. “Schools must develop customized plans which must first consider the stress that students and staff deal with in their daily lives, as well as the psychological and physiological effects of exposing them to violent scenarios in a location that for many, is their only safe harbor.”

But not everyone agrees that drills make sense, including survivors of school shootings.

“Students at my school have to go through a drill to practice for a shooting—even though we have already experienced the reality of one,” Sari Kaufman, a survivor of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, and a member of the Students Demand Action national advisory board, said in a statement. “When schools focus solely on drills, it takes their attention away from the real solutions to gun violence in schools, like keeping all firearms in the home secured and passing red flag laws.”

Abbey Clements, who was teaching second grade at the Sandy Hook school in Newtown, Connecticut, when a gunman killed 26 people in 2012, said she doesn’t believe a drill would have saved lives there.

“Our students knew what to do,” said Clements, who now teaches at another elementary school in town. “We taught them what to do in an emergency. We knew evacuation routes and where a safe spot was in the room, where nobody could see inside. But frightening students with some type of active drill, I think that is barbaric. There is no way you could possibly be prepared for the infinite number of ways that a shooting could go down with these weapons of war.”

Clements, an active member of Moms Demand Action, said it breaks her heart when she hears stories like the one about a little girl who refused to wear light-up shoes after a drill, because she was told it could make her an easier target.

“I’ve got kids at the elementary school level who tell me they have to keep a cell phone on them at all times, just in case,” she said. “It should not be like that.”

Questions Using Close Reading and Critical Thinking:

  1. The first section of an article should answer the questions “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, and “Where?” Identify the four Ws of this article. (Note: The rest of the news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
  2. Does this article have any bias? Why or why not?
  3. Why are two teachers unions asking for revision or a complete end to active-shooter drills in schools?
  4. Are there any federal recommendations for active-shooter drills? What else is troubling about these drills?
  5. Explain how active-shooter drills have become “too real.” How have the drills in your school felt?
  6. According to the article, why should each school handle active-shooter drills differently? Explain how doing this would be more effective for students and staff.
  7. Do you believe there should be changes to active-shooter drills in schools? Should the drills be eliminated completely? What suggestions do you have for your administration to properly conduct drills that would prepare students without negatively affecting their mental health?

Read the full article:

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Tell us how we can improve this post? If you would like a response, please include an email address.

Leave a Reply